System for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) for pathogenic control, and for providing a water-ozone solution to a vegetable and fruit wash

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control are described. The systems and methods generate an oxidation reduction potential that provides pathogenic control of the solution as well as pathogenic control of the surfaces with which the solution comes in immediate contact. The system supplies the solution to a vegetable and fruit wash.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The application is a Continuation-in-Part Application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/355,884 filed Nov. 18, 2016 entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING AN OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL (ORP) IN WATER FOR PATHOGENIC CONTROL which is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/050,777 filed Feb. 23, 2016 entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING AN OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL (ORP) IN WATER FOR PATHOGENIC CONTROL which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/121,770 entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING AN OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL (ORP) IN WATER FOR PATHOGENIC CONTROL, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference thereto to complete this invention if necessary.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Invention

This invention relates to improved systems and methods for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control and to provide a vegetable and fruit to pathogenically cleanse and disinfect the vegetables and fruit therein.

Description of the Related Art

A vegetable and fruit wash is a cleaning system which is designed to aid in the removal process of dirt, wax and pesticides from vegetables and fruit before they are consumed.

All fresh produce, even organic, can harbor residuals, dirt or harmful microorganisms on the surface thereof. Vegetable and fruit washes may be a number of specially-marketed commercial brands, or they may be home recipes. Commercial vegetable and fruit washes generally contain surfactants, along with chelating agents, antioxidants, and other agents. Home recipes are generally dilations of hydrogen peroxide or vinegar, the former of which may be dangerous at high concentrations. To date, there is little evidence that vegetable and fruit washes, which use water only, are effective at reducing the presence of harmful microorganisms, though the application in removing simple dirt and wax is not contested. Thus, many vegetable and fruit washes use chemicals and other treatments for washing produce.

Chlorine is used most frequently as a sanitizing agent for produce. Chlorine does remove some of the bacteria on the produce but it can cause mutations or carcinogenic reaction products by reacting with organic residues.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key aspects or essential aspects of the claimed subject matter. Moreover, this Summary is not intended for use as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.

Systems and methods for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control are described. A system embodiment includes an ozone generator, a water inlet, a venturi, and a water outlet. The venturi is positioned to receive ozone generated by the ozone generator and to receive water from the water inlet, where the venturi provides mixing of the water and ozone to provide a water and ozone solution having an ORP suitable for pathogenic control.

A plurality of the systems of this invention are mounted on a supporting wall with the outputs of the systems being fluidly connected together in a parallel manner to supply the water and ozone solution, having an ORP suitable for pathogenic control, to a vegetable and fruit wash.

It is a principal object of the invention to provide improved systems and methods for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control.

A further objection of the invention is to provide a vegetable and fruit wash to enable the vegetable and fruit in the wash to be cleansed and disinfected with the water and ozone solution of this invention.

A further object of the invention is to entirely replace the use of chlorine in all vegetable and fruit washes.

A further object of the invention is to provide a system designed to reduce the effects of the environmental damages caused by the corrosive properties of chlorine on the floors, walls and equipment within a facility such as vegetable and fruit handling facilities.

A further object of the invention is to provide a system wherein the water and ozone solution produced by the system will not harm persons coming into contact with the water and ozone solution of this invention.

Still another object of the invention is to provide a water and ozone solution which is a FDA approved antimicrobial agent and which has FDA approval for contact with food or as a food additive.

These and other objects will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The detailed description is described with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the use of the same reference numbers in different instances in the description and the figures may indicate similar or identical items.

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a system for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control in accordance with example implementations of the present disclosure;

FIG. 2 is a top view of a system for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control in accordance with example implementations of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3 is a top view of a system for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control in accordance with example implementations of the present disclosure;

FIG. 4 is a partial cross-sectional view of a flow control portion of a system for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control, such as the system shown in FIG. 2 or 3;

FIG. 5 is a chart of relative oxidation strength of certain oxidizers;

FIG. 6 is a partial side view which illustrates one of the systems of this invention connected to a source of water under pressure;

FIG. 7 is a schematic of the invention; and

FIG. 8 is a partial perspective view of the invention with a plurality of the systems of this invention being mounted on a wall.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Embodiments are described more fully below with reference to the accompanying figures, which form a part hereof and show, by way of illustration, specific exemplary embodiments. These embodiments are disclosed in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention. However, embodiments may be implemented in many different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense in that the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims.

An Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) value can be used for water system monitoring to reflect the antimicrobial potential of a given sample of water. ORP is measured in millivolts (mV), with typically no correction for solution temperature, where a positive voltage shows a solution attracting electrons (e.g., an oxidizing agent). For instance, chlorinated water will show a positive ORP value whereas sodium sulfite (a reducing agent) loses electrons and will show a negative ORP value. Similar to pH, ORP is not a measurement of concentration directly, but rather of activity level. In a solution of only one active component, ORP indicates concentration. The World Health Organization (WHO) adopted an ORP standard for drinking water disinfection of 650 millivolts. That is, the WHO stated that when the oxidation-reduction potential in a body of water measures 650 (about ⅔ of a volt), the sanitizer in the water is active enough to destroy harmful organisms almost instantaneously. For example E. coli, Salmonella, Listeria, and Staph pathogens have survival times of under 30 seconds when the ORP is above 650 mV, compared against >300 seconds when it is below 485 mV.

An example ORP sensor uses a small platinum surface to accumulate charge without reacting chemically. That charge is measured relative to the solution, so the solution “ground” voltage comes from the reference junction. For example, an ORP probe can be considered a millivolt meter, measuring the voltage across a circuit formed by a reference electrode constructed of silver wire (in effect, the negative pole of the circuit), and a measuring electrode constructed of a platinum band (the positive pole), with the water in-between.

Increasingly, microbial issues are commanding the attention of water treatment operators, regulators, media, and consumers. There are many treatment options to eliminate pathogenic microbes from drinking water. One such option includes ozone (O₃), an oxidizing agent approved for drinking water treatment by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. For instance, ozone is one of the strongest disinfectants approved for potable water treatment capable of inactivating bacteria, viruses, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium.

Accordingly, the present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control. An example system includes an ozone generator, a water inlet, a water outlet, and a venturi (e.g., a Venturi tube, venturi injector, etc.) coupled with each of the ozone generator, the water inlet, and the water outlet. Such example system is configured to output water having an ORP of about 600 mV to about 800 mV, with particular implementations being configured to output water having an ORP of about 650 mV to about 750 mV to provide pathogenic control. Further, the present disclosure is also directed to a system wherein the water and ozone solution is supplied to one or more wash-down stations to enable the areas around the wash-down stations to be sprayed to cleanse those areas.

Example Implementations

Referring generally to FIGS. 1-3, a system 100 for creating an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) in water for pathogenic control is shown in accordance with example implementations of the present disclosure. As shown, the system 100 generally includes an ozone generator 102, a water inlet 104, a water outlet 106, and a venturi 108 (e.g., a Venturi tube, venturi injector, etc.) coupled with each of the ozone generator 102, the water inlet 104, and the water outlet 106. The system 100 can include a housing 110 for receiving the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106 and the venturi 108 there-between and for mounting the ozone generator 102. The housing 110 can include a removable cover portion 112 which can enclose (e.g., when secured) and provide access to (e.g., when removed) the components housed in an interior portion 114 of the housing 110. The removable cover portion 114 can be secured to the housing 110 via one or more fasteners 116 (e.g., screws to mate with bores in the housing 110). The housing 110 can further include coupling portions to couple with a power source 118, a switch 120 to engage or disengage power to the system 100, an indicator 122 (e.g., a light source), and the like.

In implementations, the conventional ozone generator 102 includes a corona discharge tube configured to use oxygen from the surrounding air to generate ozone, such as through splitting of oxygen molecules in the air through electrical discharge caused by supplying power to a dielectric material within the corona discharge tube. For example, the ozone generator 102 can include an input port 124 to receive ambient air within the housing 110 into the ozone generator 102 to convert oxygen from the ambient air into ozone. The housing 110 can include an aperture 126 to receive ambient air into the housing 110, such as when the removable cover portion 112 is secured in place. In implementations, the power source 118 can include a 120V power supply that is transformed via transformer 128 suitable for applying the voltage to the dielectric within the corona discharge tube of the ozone generator 102. For example, the ozone generator 102 can be operated at 110 volts/60 Hz and have an operating frequency of about 450 KHz and 550 KHz, with a power rating of less than about 15 watts, and with a unit performance for electrical consumption of about 32 watts. In implementations, the ozone generator 102 has an operating frequency of about 480 KHz. Further, the ozone generator 102 can be provided according to ISO 9001 CE standards. The ozone generator 102 can produce from about 800 mg ozone per hour to about 1200 mg ozone per hour. In implementations, the ozone generator 102 produces about 1000 mg ozone per hour. The ozone generator 102 can include other methods and systems for generating ozone, including but not limited to, electrochemical cells configured to generate ozone from water by placing an anode and a cathode in contact with opposite sides of a proton exchange membrane (PEM), and supplying power to the cell, whereby water flowing over the surface of the anode breaks down into hydrogen atoms and oxygen atoms that assemble to form O₃ (ozone).

The system 100 can include one or more of a filter 125 (or dryer) and a compressor 127 in communication with the input port 124 via a coupling 129 to filter and/or compress ambient air received by the ozone generator 102. For example, the compressor 127 can include a port to receive ambient air (e.g., air within the interior region 114 of the housing 110), whereby the filter 125 interact with the air, which is then introduced to the ozone generator 102 via the coupling 129 and the input port 124. The filter 125 can dry the air received by the compressor 127 by removing water vapor or moisture therefrom, where the water could inhibit the production of ozone by the ozone generator 102. The pressure provided by the compressor 127 can vary depending on the water pressure supplied to the system 100 via the water inlet 104, where the pressure applied by the compressor 127 can be balanced based on the flow rate of air received by the ozone generator 102 via the input port 124 and the water pressure supplied to the system 100 via the water inlet 104 to obtain a particular ORP of the water at the water outlet 106. For example, in implementations, the compressor 127 can compress the filtered air at least about 15 KPa (e.g., more particularly at a pressure of 18 KPa or about 2.6 psi) to provide a gas throughput in the ozone generator 102 of about 8 SCFH (standard cubic feet per hour), where the water pressure at the water inlet 104 is about 50 psi to 55 psi (e.g., a reasonable rating for many residential and commercial facilities), to provide an ORP in the water at the water outlet of at least about 600 mV (e.g., about 600 mV to about 800 mV, more particularly about 650 mV to about 750 mV). At these pressures, the ozone generator 102 has a residence time of the gas of about three seconds. The pressure applied by the compressor 127 of the ozone generator 102 can affect the rate at which the gas flows through the ozone generator 102, which can affect contact time of the air with the components of the ozone generator 102, which can also affect mass gas transfer rates within the ozone generator 102.

In implementations, the system 100 can include a plurality of ozone generators 102. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, the system 100 includes a first ozone generator 102 a and a second ozone generator 102 b in series with the first ozone generator 102 a. The first ozone generator 102 a is supplied with power from a first transformer 128 a coupled with the power source 118, whereas the second ozone generator 102 b is supplied with power from a second transformer 128 b also coupled with the power source 118. Ambient air from within the housing 110 can be drawn into the first ozone generator 102 a via the port 124 a (where such air can be filtered and compressed), where fluids can be subsequently introduced to the second ozone generator 102 b in series with the first ozone generator 102 a via coupling 130. In implementations, the plurality of ozone generators 102 provides one or more backup ozone generators 102 in case of malfunction or inoperability of one or more of the other ozone generators 102. Each ozone generator 102 can include an operating life of about 10,000 working hours.

Referring to FIGS. 2-4, the venturi 108 can include an injector venturi design (e.g., a “T” design), where the venturi 108 is coupled between the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106, and where ozone generated by the ozone generator 102 is introduced to the venturi 108 through another port (e.g., port 132) positioned perpendicular to the flow path of the water (from the water inlet 104 to the water outlet 106). In implementations, the venturi 108 is coupled to the ozone generator via a coupling 134 connected to port 132. During operation, the ozone generated by the ozone generator 102 is drawn into the venturi 108 and mixed with the water stream flowing from the water inlet 104 to the water outlet 106. A pressure differential between the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106 is utilized to facilitate drawing the ozone into the venturi 108 and to facilitate mixing of the ozone and the water. FIG. 4 provides a diagrammatic representation of ozone molecules 136 mixing with water 138 (e.g., via vortex action) within the venturi 108, and further mixing downstream from the port 132 toward the water outlet 106. In an implementation, a pressure differential greater than 20 psi inlet over outlet (e.g., at least a 20 psi difference between the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106, with pressure higher at the water inlet 104) is provided to generate negative suction in the venturi 108 relative to the ozone generator 102 to thereby draw in the generated ozone through the port 132, while assuring the energy for water flow and pressure for operation of the venturi 108.

In implementations, in order to further increase effectiveness of the mixing process delivered by the venturi 108, the water and ozone solution passes through an in-line mixer 140 coupled between the venturi 108 and the water outlet 106. The in-line mixer 140 can facilitate further breaking or mixing of ozone bubbles already introduced to the water to generate a mixture (or solution) of water and substantially uniform-sized ozone bubbles. The small uniform-size ozone bubbles can adhere to each other to lower the surface tension of the water and ozone solution. For example, water can have a surface tension of about 72 Newtons (N), whereas the solution of water and substantially uniform-sized ozone bubbles can have a surface tension of about 58 Newtons (N). In implementations, the in-line mixer 140 has an internal diameter that equals an internal diameter of the output port of the venturi to which the in-line mixer 140 is coupled. The same internal diameter can provide an uninterrupted transition of the fluid flowing from the venturi 108 to the in-line mixer 140, such as to maintain a vortex action or mixing action of the water and the ozone bubbles. The in-line mixer 140 also provides increased contact time between the water and ozone bubbles and can facilitate preparation of uniform ozone bubble size. In implementations, the in-line mixture 140 has a length of about two inches downstream from the venturi 108, which can allow sufficient time for the velocity of the vortex action caused by the pressure differential of the venturi 108 to crush the gaseous bubbles entrained in the solution into uniformed size bubbles. The in-line mixer 140 can also reintroduce undissolved gas back into the solution resulting in increased efficiency as well as reduced off-gas at the point of application. The in-line mixer 140 can include multiple chambers through which the water and ozone solution flows. The size of the chambers can be determined based on the water flow (e.g., throughput), gas mixing, and desired time exposure. In implementations, operation of the system 100 produces a water stream at the water outlet 106 having a molar concentration of ozone of at least 20%, or more particularly at least 25%, far surpassing previous systems that have mass gas transfer rates of less than 10%.

In implementations, the system 100 is an ultra-compact system (e.g., 8″×8″×4″ enclosure, 12″×12″×6″ enclosure, or the like) configured to provide an ozone-rich water stream at a rate of about 3 gal/min, and can treat water having inlet pressures of between 15 psi and 85 psi to provide water having an ORP of between 650 mV and 750 mV to provide pathogenic control without introduction of harsh treatment chemicals, such as chlorine. After operation of the system 100, the output water/ozone mixture can provide removal of organic and inorganic compounds, can provide removal of micro-pollutants (e.g., pesticides), can provide enhancement of the flocculation/coagulation decantation process, can provide enhanced disinfection while reducing disinfection by-products, can provide odor and taste elimination of the treated water, and so forth. The solubility of ozone in water is quite good, about 10 to 15 times greater than for oxygen under normal drinking water treatment conditions. About 0.1 to 0.6 liters of ozone will dissolve in one liter of water. The size of the ozone gas bubble in the system 100 can influence gas transfer characteristics. In implementations, the venturi 108 and in-line mixer 140 provide an ozone bubble size of about 2 to about 3 microns. For instance, micro-bubbles can be produced via the venturi 108, and/or sheared into uniformed micro-size bubbles as the solution passed through the in-line mixer 140.

Corona discharge ozone can be used virtually anywhere, such as with portable implementations of the system 100. Since ozone is made on site, as needed and where needed, there is no need to ship, store, handle or dispose of it, nor any containers associated with shipping, storing, handling, and disposing a treatment chemical, as is the situation with most chemicals utilized in water treatment.

The system 100 can provide indications pertaining to the operation status of the system 100, such as to ensure proper operation, or to provide an indication regarding a need for adjustment, servicing, or maintenance. For example, with general reference to FIGS. 1-4 in an implementation, the system 100 further includes a flow meter 142 coupled between the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106. The flow meter 142 is shown coupled between the water inlet 104 and the venturi 108, however in implementations, a flow meter 142 could be additionally or alternatively coupled between the venturi 108 and the water outlet 106. The flow meter 142 can be configured to provide an electric signal indicative of a flow of fluid through the system 100. For example, the flow meter 142 can include a mechanical flow meter, an electromagnetic flow meter, a pressure-based flow meter, an optical flow meter, or the like, configured to provide an electric signal indicative of a flow of fluid (e.g., water) through the system 100. In implementations, the flow meter 142 can include a solenoid-based flow detector, such as to avoid significant restriction of flow between the water inlet 104 and the water outlet 106. The flow meter 142 can be configured to send the signal to the indicator 122 that provides a visual, tactile, or audible indication that the fluid (e.g., water) is flowing through the system 100. In an implementation, the indicator 122 is a light source (e.g., an LED) configured to illuminate upon receiving a signal from the flow meter 142. In an implementation, the indicator 122 is also coupled to a sensor (e.g., a relay) configured to measure that a voltage is applied to the ozone generator 102. When a proper voltage is applied to the ozone generator 102, the sensor can send a signal to the indicator 122. In an implementation, the indicator will provide a visual, tactile, or audible indication when each of the sensor and the flow meter 142 provide their respective signals to the indicator 122. For example, the system 100 can include a relay 144 coupled to each of the power source 118 and the flow meter 142. The relay 144 is configured to send an activation signal to the indicator 122 when the power source 118 is providing power to the ozone generator 102 and when the flow meter 142 provides a signal regarding fluid flow through the system 100. In such a configuration, the indicator 122 can verify that the system 100 is operating under design conditions (e.g., having an active flow of water, and having a sufficient power supply to the ozone generator 102).

The system 100 may be configured to provide multiple options for the distribution of the solution of water and ozone provided at the water outlet 106. The system 100 includes a distribution line 148 which extends from water outlet 106. The system 100 also includes a water line 150 which extends from water inlet 104. Water line 150 is connected to a water line 152 by a tee-fitting 154. Water line 152 is connected to a source of water under pressure. The distribution lines 148 are fluidly connected to the intake side of a pump 156.

The distribution lines 148 are connected to the intake side of pump 156. Distribution line 158 extends from the discharge side of pump 156 and through the wall 159. Water line 152 is connected to a pump 160. The intake side of pump 160 is fluidly connected to a float valve assembly 162 having a float valve 164 connected to a source of fresh water by line 166. A water outlet line 168 extends from float valve assembly 162 and extends through wall 159. Preferably, a Lakos (separator) 169 is imposed in line 168. Line 168 is connected to the inlet side of a pump 170. The discharge side of pump 170 is fluidly connected to a wash tank 172 having an open upper end. A spray nozzle system or array 174 is mounted on the upper end of wash tank 172 with the inlet end being fluidly connected to the discharge side of pump 156 by the line 158. In use, the vegetables and fruit are placed in wash tank 172. Fresh water is supplied to the interior of wash tank 172 from the float valve assembly 162. The actuation of pump 160 causes the float valve assembly 162 be filled with water with the float valve 166 being opened to supply water to the systems 100 by way of the lines 152 and 150. The actuation of the systems 100 and the pump 156 causes the water-ozone mixture to be supplied to the spray nozzle system 174 thereby spraying the vegetables and fruit within the wash tank 172 with the water-ozone solution.

In implementations, the system 100 can include an in-line ORP meter positioned to measure the ORP of the water and ozone solution, such as adjacent the water outlet (e.g., within the housing 110, outside the housing 110, etc.), coupled with the distribution line 146, or the like. The in-line ORP meter can be coupled with the relay 144, such that the in-line ORP meter provides a signal to the relay 144 upon detection of a desired ORP or range of ORPs (e.g., at least 600 mV, at least 650 mV, etc.). The relay 144 can then provide an activation signal to the indicator 122 upon proper functioning of the system 100 (e.g., when the power source 118 is providing power to the ozone generator 102, when the flow meter 142 provides a signal regarding fluid flow through the system 100, and when the in-line ORP meter detects a desired ORP of the water and ozone solution generated by the system 100). When the indicator 122 is not activated, this can provide an indication that a component or components of the system 100 may need adjustment, servicing, or maintenance. Alternatively, the system 100 can be configured to activate the indicator 122 upon failure of one or more of the components of the system 100 (e.g., no power supplied to the ozone generator 102, no flow of water detected by the flow meter 142, or an undesired ORP detected by the in-line ORP meter).

By providing an ORP of between 650 mV and 750 mV with the system, the output water can be utilized to destroy various pathogens, including, but not limited to, algae (e.g., blue-green), bacteria (e.g., Aeromonas & Actinomycetes, Bacillus, Campylobacters, Clostridium botulinum, Escherichia coli (E. coli), Flavobacterium, Helicobacter (pylori), Heterotrophic Bacteria, Legionella pneumophila, Micrococcus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella, Shigella shigellosis (dysentery), Staphylococcus sp, albus, aureus, Streptococcus, Vibrio: alginolyticus, anguillarium, parahemolyticus, Yersinia enterocolitica), fungi, molds, yeasts, mold spores, nematodes, protozoa (e.g., Acanthamoeba & Naegleria, Amoeboe Trophozoites, Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora, Entamobea (histolytica), Giardia lamblia, Giardia muris, Microsporidium, N. gruberi), trematodes, viruses (e.g., Adenovirus, Astrovirus, Cailcivirus, Echovirus, Encephalomyocarditis, Enterovirus, coxsachie, poliovirus, Hepatitis A, B and C, Myxovirus influenza, Norwalk, Picobirnavirus, Reovirus, Rotavirus).

Water Treatment

Microbiological organisms/species can reside in water sources, including water intended for drinking recreation. Among the microbiological threats is the protozoan parasite—cryptosporidium (crypto). Crypto can be a particular challenge for the water treatment industry, however, ozone can eliminate it. Ozone, molecularly known as O₃, is a sanitizer and is relentless in its attack of organic microbes (bacteria, viruses, cysts, etc.). Through a process known as lysing, ozone breaks down cell walls or membranes, where it can then destroy the nucleus of the microbe. In addition to sanitation, ozone can provide for the oxidizing of inorganic material that could be present in water, such as metals (e.g., iron and manganese). Although there are a few stronger oxidizers, ozone is the strongest that is readily available for commercial or residential use. FIG. 6 provides a chart showing relative oxidizer strength for a variety of oxidizers. As shown, ozone is about 1.5 times stronger than chlorine, and can provide a faster oxidizing action. Furthermore, because of this higher oxidation strength, ozone does build up a tolerance to microbes unlike other sanitizers, such as chlorine. Within the microbial world protozoa, such as crypto, are some of the most resistant to all types of disinfectants. One reason for this resistance is due to its hard outer protective shell, which must be broken through prior to the microbe being inactivated. Crypto can cause a variety of ailments, including abdominal cramping, diarrhea, fever and nausea that can last as long as a month, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Disinfectants used to ward off cryptosporidium for water treatment applications can include chlorine (liquid state), chloramines, chlorine-dioxide (gaseous state), and ozone. However, their ability to perform this inactivation duty should not be regarded equal, as each sanitizer requires a specific level of concentration and contact time to take effect, as described by the following.

To better determine the specific amount of the disinfectant required to inactivate or destroy a microbe, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined Ct Values. These Ct Values are the product of the disinfectant's concentration (C, expressed in mg/L) and the contact time (t, expressed in minutes). These Ct Values are calculated specifically to the percentage of microbial kill or better known as the log reduction, e.g. 1-Log=90.0 percent, 2-Log=99.0 percent or 3−Log=99.9 percent inactivation of the particular microbe. According to the EPA, chlorine dioxide would require a Ct of 226, which would correlate to 226 mg/L, at one minute of contact time, at 25° C. to achieve a 3-Log reduction or 99.9 percent inactivation. Although, ozone would only require a Ct of 7.4, correlating to 7.4 mg/L, to achieve the same 99.9 percent inactivation with the same parameters as chlorine dioxide. Ct is a product of concentration and time, and as such, both can be manipulated, as long as the given Ct Value is obtained for the desired log reduction (e.g. Ozone Ct of 7.4 can be achieved with a concentration 3.7 mg/L for two minutes of time).

Cryptosporidium outbreaks in public drinking waters and recreational swimming pools are becoming more and more of an evident issue. Unfortunately, forms of chlorine sanitation are not often the best solution, especially for high organic and inorganic contaminant levels, as they will create chlorine oxidation by-products, such as trihalomethanes (THM) and chloramine derivatives. These by-products are the typical cause of (what most associate as being over chlorinated) the chlorine smell in drinking or pool waters, and are the cause of itchy, smelly skin and burning eyes in pool water. Although with a properly sized system, ozone can be used as the primary sanitizing and oxidizing agent, oxidizing the contaminants completely. Using ozone in this manner would then allow chlorine to be used as the secondary residual sanitizer to satisfy regulatory requirements, without the production of chloramines and chlorine's side effects.

Further, ozone can be used to remove iron and manganese from water, forming a precipitate that can be filtered: 2Fe²⁺+O₃+5H₂O→2Fe(OH)₃(s)+O₂+4H⁺ Mn²⁺+2O₃+4H₂O→2MN(OH)₂(s)+2O₂+4H⁺

Ozone will also reduce dissolved hydrogen sulfide in water to sulfurous acid: 3O₃+H₂S→3H₂SO₃+3O₂

The reactions involved iron, manganese, and hydrogen sulfide can be especially important in the use of ozone-based well water treatment. Further, ozone will also detoxify cyanides by converting the cyanides to cyanates (on the order of 1,000 times less toxic): CN⁻+O₃→CNO⁻+O₂

Ozone will also completely decompose urea, where recent outbreaks of E. coli in lettuce have been impacted by urea: (NH₂)₂CO+O₃→N₂+CO₂+2H₂O

Thus it can be seen that the invention accomplishes at least all of its stated objectives.

Although the invention has been described in language that is specific to certain structures and methodological steps, it is to be understood that the invention defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific structures and/or steps described. Rather, the specific aspects and steps are described as forms of implementing the claimed invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be practiced without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended. 

I claim:
 1. A pathogenic control system, comprising: a plurality of housings; each of said housings containing: (a) an ozone generator configured to generate ozone; (b) a water inlet configured to receive water from a water source; (c) a venturi coupled with the water source to receive water within the venturi, the venturi also coupled with the ozone generator and configured to introduce ozone generated by the ozone generator to water received at the water inlet to provide a water and ozone solution having an ORP of at least 600 millivolts; (d) a water outlet coupled with the venturi, the water outlet having a fluid pressure of the water and ozone solution less than a fluid pressure of water received at the water inlet; a first pump spaced from said housings and which has an intake side and a discharge side; said water outlets of said housings being fluidly connected to said intake side of said first pump in a parallel manner; a vegetable and fruit wash tank having an open upper end; said vegetable and fruit wash tank, having a spray nozzle assembly at its said open upper end; said discharge side of said first pump being in fluid communication with said spray nozzle assembly for supplying the water and ozone solution to said spray nozzle assembly; said vegetable and fruit wash tank having a fresh water intake formed therein; a second pump having an intake side and a discharge side; said discharge side of said second pump being in fluid communication with said fresh water intake of said vegetable and fruit wash tank; said intake side of said second pump being in fluid communication with a source of fresh water; a first water supply line fluidly connected to said water inlets of said housings with said first water supply line having an intake end; a float valve assembly having a first fluid outlet which is fluidly connected to said intake side of said second pump; a second water supply line; said float valve assembly having a second fluid outlet which is fluidly connected to said second water supply line and a first water inlet which is fluidly connected to said vegetable and fruit wash tank; and a third pump imposed in said second water supply line. 